A weather station tells you what fell on one point. Underwriting and lending need to know how much water is actually in the root zone and how fast the crop is using it, across every parcel in the book. We map soil moisture and evapotranspiration from orbit at parcel scale, on a repeating cycle, and deliver each value with a calibrated uncertainty band — so a drought-stress signal can drive pricing, payout triggers and irrigation decisions, not just a colour on a map.
A parcel-scale soil-moisture and evapotranspiration layer with a calibrated prediction interval on every value, benchmarked against in-situ soil and flux stations — turning the root-zone water balance into an underwritable, financeable number.
No single accuracy percentage is quoted below. The differentiator is a calibrated interval on every parcel value, benchmarked against independent soil and flux measurements.
Yes — because each parcel value arrives as a conformal prediction interval with guaranteed coverage, so the band an actuary loads into a model has a property that holds out of sample. Soil moisture and evapotranspiration are benchmarked against in-situ soil-moisture probes and flux (eddy-covariance) reference stations, with the gridded climate inputs that feed the indices bias-checked against the national meteorological network before any downstream model sees them.
Spatial: mapped at parcel scale, with sub-parcel detail where the field is large enough relative to sensor resolution.
Temporal: refreshed on the satellite revisit cycle through the growing season — optical and thermal depend on clear sky, radar continues through cloud to keep the soil-moisture signal alive.
Tabular feeds map onto actuarial pricing and loan-scoring pipelines; rasters import into farm-management and irrigation-planning platforms.
Three honest limits, three mitigations. (1) Cloud blocks optical and thermal sensing; we maintain continuity with radar, which retrieves a surface-soil-moisture signal through cloud, and we state any residual gap rather than interpolate over it silently. (2) Small and fragmented parcels fall near or below sensor resolution; those parcels are flagged and carry a wider interval, so the uncertainty is priced rather than ignored. (3) The root zone sits below what any sensor sees directly: satellites observe the surface and the canopy, so root-zone water is inferred from the surface signal plus the modelled water balance and crop water use, with the interval widening for the inferred depth.
In short: where the signal is thin, the band is wide and visible — never a confident number with a hidden caveat.
Outputs support parametric and indemnity agri-insurance design, CSRD-aligned water and climate disclosure for agribusiness, and an auditable basis for credit decisions. Processing runs under EU data residency.
We do not claim a regulatory product certification we do not hold, and we say so. The layer feeds the actuarial, credit and reporting processes you already run.
The product delivers a near-real-time monitoring view of root-zone water and crop water use across the season, plus a short-range drought-stress outlook where soil moisture and weather inputs are well observed. Forward-looking values carry their own widening band, so a stress warning is always paired with a quantified confidence rather than presented as certainty.
| ATTRIBUTE | SOIL MOISTURE & ET · AGRONOMY INTELLIGENCE |
|---|---|
| Primary client | Agri-insurers, agri-finance, large farms and cooperatives |
| Spatial resolution | Parcel scale, with sub-parcel detail on larger fields |
| Update frequency | Satellite revisit cycle through the season; radar continues through cloud |
| Uncertainty | Calibrated prediction interval (conformal, guaranteed coverage) on every parcel value |
| Validation reference | In-situ soil-moisture probes and flux stations; met network for input climate fields |
| Delivery | API · GeoTIFF · vector parcel tables · PDF report · SaaS dashboard |
| Integration | Actuarial / credit pipelines; farm-management and irrigation platforms |
| Horizon | Near-real-time monitoring plus short-range drought-stress outlook |
| Key limitation | Cloud, small parcels and root-zone depth — mitigated by radar, wider intervals and water-balance inference |
| Compliance relevance | Parametric / indemnity insurance design, CSRD-aligned disclosure; EU data residency |
This slot is reserved for a completed design-partner pilot. We do not publish a case study before the work exists. When a pilot closes it will carry the portfolio or farm context, the comparison against that client's own ground reference, and the realised interval coverage at parcel scale.
Residual tables against soil and flux reference, the interval-coverage protocol and the small-parcel flagging rules ship under NDA with every pilot.
Start a pilot See how we validate